Is Drug Screening Too Expensive To Do Or Do It Without?
Is Drug Screening Too Expensive To Do Or Do It Without? One company has the answer!
The telemarketing operations director at a financial services company looks out over his 3,600 square foot call center on a typical Monday morning. Look at all the empty chairs, he complains. It’s sickly Monday and my parties take their usual unscheduled day break. The problem of the three-day weekend or absence in general does not affect the driver in this area. What about the other 80% of the workforce that arrived? They are now charged with additional duties while filling the vacancies temporarily developed.
With the challenge of recruiting qualified workers, it gets harder across the country. The last thing American businesses can afford is to abuse large portions of its existing workforce on or off the job. The truth is, most employees do not engage in illegal drug use, and most do not work with drug abuse. A majority of employees are parents who are worried about the effects of drug abuse on their children, now and in the future. Given this profile of typical American workers, it is clear that substance abuse prevention can and should be viewed as a common concern of both employers and employees.
We interviewed a company that recognizes the real damage caused by drugs in the workplace and why it still occurs. Labwire, Inc. (http://www.labwire.com), a developer of online security solutions in Houston, Texas, has begun addressing how many medium and bulk companies have consistently failed to add the true cost effectiveness of their testing programs . What stops companies from working effectively on drug prevention in the workplace is the apparent cost to do so, says Dexter Morris, president of the company. What most companies don’t understand is the wastage cost of NOT using the latest in technology management to deal with such problems, he added.
Workplace drugs cost billions of dollars each year in lost productivity, increased health problems and workplace accidents. To say nothing of the problems it causes at federal and state level with accompanying family problems. In contrast to the typical depiction of drug abusers, many seemingly functional drug and alcohol abusers beat full or part-time work, masking their devastating problem of their employers. In fact, over seventy percent of all current illegal drug and heavy alcohol users are doing some work. * (Those who drink five or more drinks per occasion over five or more days in the 30 days preceding the admission). According to the US Department of Labor, more than 8 million Americans use some sort of illegal substance.
The total cost of illegal drug abuse is estimated at $ 160.7 billion in 2000, and 69 percent of these are from productivity-related drug-related illness and death. The reduction of drug abuse positively affects the economic landscape of America.
Medium businesses carry the greatest burden of substance abusers. Traditionally, larger employers participate in drug-free workplace practices. As a result, medium to large employers who do not have drug-free workplace policies are essentially chosen against the employees who remain to rent. Another thing to note is that the drug abusers will push away from drug-free workplace companies. They will work for businesses that do not have a policy or program and where there are no drug trials involved. Let’s face, no offender wants to be detected.
The fact that medium and bulk companies are at the greatest risk is why we have developed our web-based employee screening process. Any company can deploy this system within 30 days, Morris confidently says. In fact, we can train up to 100 people on how to use our system online within 60 minutes.
Morris further said that only the cost of workers’ compensation claims could bury a company.
Drug-using workers are 3.6 times more likely to be involved in workplace casualties and five times more likely to file a workforce claim. Between thirty and fifty percent of all workers are remunerated with drug abuse per National Remuneration Council. Substance abusers are three times more likely to use medical benefits than other employees.
According to Edward Poole, president and COO of OHS Health and Safety Services Inc., in Costa Mesa, California, several government and private industry studies have concluded that every drug user in the workplace has an average of $ 11,000 – $ 13,000 per employee. years can pay “Despite studies and surveys that indicate a significant number of abusers, work and work while under the influence, Poole points out that many employers have a” this can’t happen here “attitude to drug abuse in the workplace “As soon as they enter and implement a policy and start testing employees, they are usually very surprised by the results,” he said,
telling the story of one client operating a small local delivery service. OHS Health and Safety Services visited the business owner, saying repeatedly that there was no reason to do drug trials in that workplace, since the company has only 63 employees. After a few years of withholding them, the service provider called the OHS to launch an immediate screening program. Apparently, the company had a change in heart after observing unusual behavior in their workforce. OHS one day became unannounced after doing about 45 days of drug-free workplace nutrition and doing what was called a “whip”. They will test every employee in the workplace.
Nine people immediately left the job. Says Poole, “One or two probably have a deeply founded belief in the right to privacy and all the crap, but it’s probably safe to say that most of the nine employees have tested positive.” Of the 54 who took the drug test, 19 tested positive for marijuana and several positive tests for cocaine. “The employer was shocked,” Poole said. Most employers have no idea how many employees work under the influence. “
Once a company decides to confront its potential workplace issue regarding illegal drug use, the problem is finding appropriate security companies. There are many companies claiming to have the expertise to address drug investigations,” warns Morris. Find out what their record is and talk to some of their clients
Many companies are on their way to warning about drug abuse in the workplace, according to data on companies testing employees, drug testing in one six-year period of twenty-one and a half percentages up to almost eighty five percent – an increase of two hundred and fifty percent. Recent evidence suggests that drug trials have now flattened and actually decreased slightly, but mainly among medium-sized businesses. country’s largest firms engage in some drug testing, including Fortune 500 companies in the late 1980s and early 1990s. For example, in 1985, about eighteen percent of Fortune 500 companies tested their employees. The number increased to a high of forty percent in 1991. Among Fortune 1000 companies, forty-eight percent of employees are subject to drug testing.
These are good trends in general, Morris said when asked about the increase in drug investigations across the US. The weakness in screening program administrations (drug trials and background screens) through large and medium-sized businesses is the increasing focus of Labwire’s business model. We know what the solution is for ten thousands of companies, and we are, Morris said. With companies like Labwire, which build affordable applications, come to the scene, your call center manager might be better off attending future Monday morning.